On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:20 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The set of constants for PE states defined in uapi/linux/vfio.h is
> duplicated to uapi/asm/eeh.h. The patch removes the set from the
> former.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index d81c17f..3fd1e86 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -492,11 +492,6 @@ struct vfio_eeh_pe_op {
> #define VFIO_EEH_PE_UNFREEZE_IO 2 /* Enable IO for frozen
> PE */
> #define VFIO_EEH_PE_UNFREEZE_DMA 3 /* Enable DMA for frozen PE */
> #define VFIO_EEH_PE_GET_STATE 4 /* PE state retrieval
> */
> -#define VFIO_EEH_PE_STATE_NORMAL 0 /* PE in functional state */
> -#define VFIO_EEH_PE_STATE_RESET 1 /* PE reset in progress */
> -#define VFIO_EEH_PE_STATE_STOPPED 2 /* Stopped DMA and IO */
> -#define VFIO_EEH_PE_STATE_STOPPED_DMA 4 /* Stopped DMA only
> */
> -#define VFIO_EEH_PE_STATE_UNAVAIL 5 /* State unavailable */
> #define VFIO_EEH_PE_RESET_DEACTIVATE 5 /* Deassert PE reset */
> #define VFIO_EEH_PE_RESET_HOT 6 /* Assert hot reset
> */
> #define VFIO_EEH_PE_RESET_FUNDAMENTAL 7 /* Assert fundamental
> reset */
How do you know that nobody depends on these defines? I thought the
suggestion was to use the EEH_* defines for error injection, not to
remove existing VFIO_EEH_* defines. You could certainly redefine these
in terms of EEH_* defines instead. Thanks,
Alex
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
