On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 12:49 +0100, Greg Kurz wrote: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:21:29 +1100 > Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote: > > > From: Greg Kurz <gk...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > The goal is to verify vphn_unpack_associativity() parses VPHN numbers > > correctly. We feed it with a variety of input values and compare with > > expected results. > > > > PAPR+ does not say much about VPHN parsing: I came up with a list of > > tests that check many simple cases and some corner ones. I wouldn't > > dare to say the list is exhaustive though. > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gk...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > [mpe: Rework harness logic and rename to test-vphn] > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> > > --- > > > > I reworked this a little bit, let me know if it looks OK to you. > > > > I renamed the test to test-vphn, and I changed the test loop to only call > > the > > harness once, but report all the individual test results as well. > > I guess it is safe to assume we don't have an infinite loop bug hidding in > each individual test case.
Well if we do the whole test will be killed by the harness, so we'll still notice. > I am okay with the changes. I don't know if it is needed but here's my: > > Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <gk...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Thanks. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
