On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:41:03AM -0600, Nathan Fontenot wrote: > On 11/26/2014 09:12 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > So Nathan is working on a patch series to cleanup and improve our > > "DLPAR" infrastructure which is basically our hotplug mechanism when > > running under the PowerVM (aka pHyp) and KVM hypervisors. > > The cleanup to the dlpar infrastructure will move the entire operation > of hotplugging a device to the kernel instead of doing it partially in > userspace and partially in the kernel as is currently done. > > > > > I'll let Nathan give you a bit more details/background and answer > > subsequent question you might have as this is really his area of > > expertise. > > > > To cut a long story short, we need a sysfs file that allows our > > userspace tools to notify the kernel of hotplug events coming from > > the management console (which talks to userspace daemons using a > > proprietary protocol) to "initiate" the hotplug operations, which in > > turn get dispatched internally in the kernel to the right subsystem > > (memory, cpu, pci, ...) based on the resource type. > > > > On IRC, Greg suggested /sys/firmware and /sys/hypervisor which both > > look like a reasonable option to me, probably better than dlpar... > > For PowerVM systems we need this sysfs file to deliver what is > essentially a binary blob (specifically a rtas error log) to the > kernel. The current patch set is creating /sys/kernel/dlpar. As Ben > mentioned we would like your input on what would be the proper place > to create this file.
And what is the kernel supposed to do with such a binary blob? Parse it? Or pass it to something else? Anyway, let's see the patches before I guess anything else, that will determine how things work out best. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev