> -----Original Message-----
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
> > @@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id m25p_ids[] = {
> >     { "en25q32b",   INFO(0x1c3016, 0, 64 * 1024,   64, 0) },
> >     { "en25p64",    INFO(0x1c2017, 0, 64 * 1024,  128, 0) },
> >     { "en25q64",    INFO(0x1c3017, 0, 64 * 1024,  128, SECT_4K) },
> > +   { "en25s64",    INFO(0x1c3817, 0, 64 * 1024,  128, 0) },
> >     { "en25qh256",  INFO(0x1c7019, 0, 64 * 1024,  512, 0) },
> >
> >     /* ESMT */
> 
> This needs to be sent to the mtd and/or spi maintainers, not here.
> 
> What does this have to do with patch 2/2?  Don't put unrelated things in
> the same patchset, especially when they're destined for different
> maintainers.
> 
> -Scott
> 
[Shengzhou] thanks, sent to linux-...@lists.infradead.org already.

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to