On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 18:05 +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> Add support for EON en25s64 spi device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <shengzhou....@freescale.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
> index 7eda71d..6989311 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
> @@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id m25p_ids[] = {
> { "en25q32b", INFO(0x1c3016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) },
> { "en25p64", INFO(0x1c2017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) },
> { "en25q64", INFO(0x1c3017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) },
> + { "en25s64", INFO(0x1c3817, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) },
> { "en25qh256", INFO(0x1c7019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, 0) },
>
> /* ESMT */
This needs to be sent to the mtd and/or spi maintainers, not here.
What does this have to do with patch 2/2? Don't put unrelated things in
the same patchset, especially when they're destined for different
maintainers.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
