Hello Aneesh,
On 05/07/2014 01:35 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Emil Medve <emilian.me...@freescale.com> writes: > >> Currently bootmem is just a wrapper around memblock. This gets rid of >> the wrapper code just as other ARHC(es) did: x86, arm, etc. >> >> For now only cover !NUMA systems/builds >> >> Signed-off-by: Emil Medve <emilian.me...@freescale.com> >> --- >> >> v2: Acknowledge that NUMA systems/builds are not covered by this patch >> >> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 3 +++ >> arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 8 ++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> index e099899..07b164b 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> @@ -475,6 +475,9 @@ config SYS_SUPPORTS_HUGETLBFS >> >> source "mm/Kconfig" >> >> +config NO_BOOTMEM >> + def_bool !NUMA > > > There is actually one in mm/Kconfig > > So I guess you should make the platform that you are interested > /tested just do select No_BOOTMEM like we do in arch/arm/Kconfig etc ? I had a look at what was done for x86 and I missed why the mm/Kconfig symbol was added. Will include your suggestion in the next version Cheers, _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
