On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 13:48 -0500, Emil Medve wrote: > Currently bootmem is just a wrapper around memblock. This gets rid of > the wrapper code just as other ARHC(es) did: x86, arm, etc. > > For now only cover !NUMA systems/builds > > Signed-off-by: Emil Medve <emilian.me...@freescale.com> > --- > > v2: Acknowledge that NUMA systems/builds are not covered by this patch > > arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 3 +++ > arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > index e099899..07b164b 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > @@ -475,6 +475,9 @@ config SYS_SUPPORTS_HUGETLBFS > > source "mm/Kconfig" > > +config NO_BOOTMEM > + def_bool !NUMA
This will allow a user to manually turn on CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM in the presence of NUMA. From the changelog it sounds like this is not what you intended. What are the issues with NUMA? As is, you're not getting rid of wrapper code -- only adding ifdefs. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
