Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> writes: > On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 08:56 +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote: >> On 03/05/2014 07:26 AM, Stewart Smith wrote: >> > Vasant Hegde <hegdevas...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >> >>> +int64_t opal_send_ack_elog(uint64_t log_id); >> >> >> >> Stewart, >> >> >> >> Why are you creating 64bit log ID when actual ID is 32bit ? >> > >> > IIRC it's what OPAL gives us, even though FSP MBOX spec says 32bit. >> > >> >> Stewart, >> >> Better ask OPAL folks to fix in firmware ? > > Why bother ? That way if future versions of OPAL want to use 64-bit IDs, > they can.
Yeah, that was my thought. The number of error logs on some POWER8 systems almost needs 64bit already :) _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
