On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 08:56 +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote: > On 03/05/2014 07:26 AM, Stewart Smith wrote: > > Vasant Hegde <hegdevas...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > >>> +int64_t opal_send_ack_elog(uint64_t log_id); > >> > >> Stewart, > >> > >> Why are you creating 64bit log ID when actual ID is 32bit ? > > > > IIRC it's what OPAL gives us, even though FSP MBOX spec says 32bit. > > > > Stewart, > > Better ask OPAL folks to fix in firmware ?
Why bother ? That way if future versions of OPAL want to use 64-bit IDs, they can. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
