ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing
arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable().
We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_fiq_enable() and
this is done a second time in arch_cpu_idle_prepare() in that case. And
enabling FIQs has nothing to do with idling the CPU to start with.
So let's introduce init_fiq_boot_cpu() to take care of FIQs on the boot
CPU and remove arch_cpu_idle_prepare(). This is now done a bit earlier
at late_initcall time but this shouldn't make a difference in practice
given that FIQs are not currently used on ARM64.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <n...@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 5 -----
arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index de17c89985..f6c733da67 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -84,11 +84,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_power_off);
void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_pm_restart);
-void arch_cpu_idle_prepare(void)
-{
- local_fiq_enable();
-}
-
/*
* This is our default idle handler.
*/
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
index bd9bbd0e44..259557983a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -255,6 +255,13 @@ static int __init arm64_device_init(void)
}
arch_initcall(arm64_device_init);
+static int __init init_fiq_boot_cpu(void)
+{
+ local_fiq_enable();
+ return 0;
+}
+late_initcall(init_fiq_boot_cpu);
+
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_data);
static int __init topology_init(void)
--
1.8.4.108.g55ea5f6
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
