On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 06:54 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 18:16 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 16:31 +1100, Alistair Popple wrote: > > [...] > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/Kconfig > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/Kconfig > > > @@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ config IBM_EMAC_RGMII > > > bool > > > default n > > > > > > +config IBM_EMAC_RGMII_WOL > > > + bool > > > + default n > > > + > > [...] > > > > So no-one can even build-test this at present! > > Patch 7/7 adds the select to the platform, isn't that sufficient ?
I suppose so, but I don't think that went to netdev. > It's an SoC bit so there's little point making it generally > selectable by the user. I think a better way to do this is: config IBM_EMAC_RGMII_WOL bool "IBM EMAC RGMII wake-on-LAN support" depends on MY_WONDERFUL_NEW_SOC || COMPILE_TEST default y if MY_WONDERFUL_NEW_SOC Then anyone making an API change that affects this driver can check that it still complies. Ben. > Alistair: The commit name should be different, it's not a PHY you are > adding, it's a PHY interface (the PHY itself is off chip). -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev