On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 06:54 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 18:16 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 16:31 +1100, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > [...]
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/Kconfig
> > > @@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ config IBM_EMAC_RGMII
> > >   bool
> > >   default n
> > >  
> > > +config IBM_EMAC_RGMII_WOL
> > > + bool
> > > + default n
> > > +
> > [...]
> > 
> > So no-one can even build-test this at present!
> 
> Patch 7/7 adds the select to the platform, isn't that sufficient ?

I suppose so, but I don't think that went to netdev.

> It's an SoC bit so there's little point making it generally
> selectable by the user.

I think a better way to do this is:

config IBM_EMAC_RGMII_WOL
        bool "IBM EMAC RGMII wake-on-LAN support"
        depends on MY_WONDERFUL_NEW_SOC || COMPILE_TEST
        default y if MY_WONDERFUL_NEW_SOC

Then anyone making an API change that affects this driver can check that
it still complies.

Ben.

> Alistair: The commit name should be different, it's not a PHY you are
> adding, it's a PHY interface (the PHY itself is off chip).


-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to