On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:28:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:53:49PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 08/20/2013 01:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > The point is that it might turn into a more correct binding > > > depending on what the S/PDIF device actually is. > > > There's *never* an object on the board called a "dummy codec". > > Oh, is that what you're talking about? Yes, that makes sense. I had > been responding to the comments about the transceivers.
I'll remove the 'dummy' words in the next version from the binding doc. Thank you Nicolin _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
