On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:53:49PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/20/2013 01:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The point is that it might turn into a more correct binding > > depending on what the S/PDIF device actually is. > There's *never* an object on the board called a "dummy codec". Oh, is that what you're talking about? Yes, that makes sense. I had been responding to the comments about the transceivers.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
