On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 23:10 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > I guess we should keep the current 12us latency in g5_neo2_cpufreq_init() > (although I doubt it's correct...), and only add the new 10ms latency > value to g5_pm72_cpufreq_init() - that way we can enable the older systems > to use ondemand (despite long latencies), while not risking regressing > any of the current functionality. > > I'll resend the series with the changes.
Well, mine is a 11,2, it's not a neo2. I suppose we could try to measure the latency :-) Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
