On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 07:14 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 23:20 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > All looks good in the patchset from 10000 feet (or more), but I need > > Ben to speak here. > > I want to give it a quick spin on the HW here, I'll ack then. But yes, > it looks good.
Seems to work here on the quad G5. However, If I use on-demand, there's a huge latency of switch as far as I can tell (about 10s) after I start/stop a bunch of CPU eaters... I quite like how the userspace "powernowd" which I used to use switches more aggressively. Is that expected ? Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
