On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 12:26 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote: > So the answer is we can do it by makeing the assumption that f/w won't > return valid delay and we're going to use default value (1 second) for > guest on powernv or phyp, or we keep the delay here.
Ok, at the very least then change the name to "unavailable_delay" or something explicit like that then :-) BTW. I've already applied patches 1 and 2 to my tree, you don't have to resend those. They'll show up today or tomorrow when I push my next branch out. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
