On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 11:32 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote: > >Same comments about "state" which is really "delay" and is probably > >not necessary at all ... > > > > We need the "delay" in future to support PowerKVM guest. If the > specified PE is being reset, we rely on the delay to hold the > powerkvm guest for a while until the PE reset is done.
Do we ? Can't we just rely on "temp unavailble" result and wait 1s when that happens (then try again) ? IE, A delay associated with a state doesn't make that much sense semantically speaking. With a state *transition* maybe but this isn't what this function is about... Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
