Yes, Ben is also pointing to same thing. I will send another patch with changes suggested (with both subject and description modified) which will supersede this patch.
Regards Priyanka > -----Original Message----- > From: tiejun.chen [mailto:tiejun.c...@windriver.com] > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 12:49 PM > To: Jain Priyanka-B32167 > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421 > Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/32bit,PREEMPT:Load TI_FLAGS to check > NEED_RESCHED > > On 05/27/2013 02:55 PM, Jain Priyanka-B32167 wrote: > > > > If we go some more lines up in the same file, the code is > > > > resume_kernel: > > /* check current_thread_info, _TIF_EMULATE_STACK_STORE */ > > CURRENT_THREAD_INFO(r9, r1) > > lwz r8,TI_FLAGS(r9) > > andis. r8,r8,_TIF_EMULATE_STACK_STORE@h > > Okay, but could you fix this directly like: > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S > b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S index e514de5..4498467 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S > @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ resume_kernel: > /* check current_thread_info, _TIF_EMULATE_STACK_STORE */ > CURRENT_THREAD_INFO(r9, r1) > lwz r8,TI_FLAGS(r9) > - andis. r8,r8,_TIF_EMULATE_STACK_STORE@h > + andis. r0,r8,_TIF_EMULATE_STACK_STORE@h > beq+ 1f > > addi r8,r1,INT_FRAME_SIZE /* Get the kprobed function > entry */ > > Tiejun _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
