On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 11:57 +0530, Priyanka Jain wrote:
> Add instruction to load TI_FLAGS in r8
>
> While returning from exception handling in case of PREEMPT enabled,
> _TIF_NEED_RESCHED bit is checked in TI_FLAGS (thread_info flag) of
> current
> task. Only if this bit is set, it should continue with the process of
> calling preempt_schedule_irq() to schedule highest priority task if
> available.
>
> Current code assumes that r8 contains TI_FLAGS and check this for
> _TIF_NEED_RESCHED, but as r8 is modified in the code which executes
> before
> this check, r8 no longer contains the expected TI_FLAGS information.
Hrm, the code was supposed to still have TI_FLAGS in r8 and mostly does
until the
andis. r8,r8,_TIF_EMULATE_STACK_STORE@h
Was added which clobbers it.
Can't we just fix the above to use a different destination register ?
r0 looks fair game at this point...
> As a result check for comparison with _TIF_NEED_RESCHED was failing
> even if
> NEED_RESCHED bit is set in the current thread_info flag. Due to this,
> preempt_schedule_irq() and in turn scheduler was not getting called
> even if
> highest priority task is ready for execution.
Ben.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
