On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 17:32:24 +0800 Tang Chen <tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> This patch-set aims to implement physical memory hot-removing. As you were on th patch delivery path, all of these patches should have your Signed-off-by:. But some were missing it. I fixed this in my copy of the patches. I suspect this patchset adds a significant amount of code which will not be used if CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n. "[PATCH v6 06/15] memory-hotplug: implement register_page_bootmem_info_section of sparse-vmemmap", for example. This is not a good thing, so please go through the patchset (in fact, go through all the memhotplug code) and let's see if we can reduce the bloat for CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n kernels. This needn't be done immediately - it would be OK by me if you were to defer this exercise until all the new memhotplug code is largely in place. But please, let's do it. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
