On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 06:43:38PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> slice array size and slice mask size depend on PGTABLE_RANGE. We
> can't directly include pgtable.h in these header because there is
> a circular dependency. So add compile time check for these values.

Some comments below...

>  struct slice_mask {
>       u16 low_slices;
>       /*
> -      * This should be derived out of PGTABLE_RANGE. For the current
> -      * max 64TB, u64 should be ok.
> +      * We do this as a union so that we can verify
> +      * SLICE_MASK_SIZE against PGTABLE_RANGE
>        */
> -     u64 high_slices;
> +     union {
> +             u64 high_slices;
> +             unsigned char not_used[SLICE_MASK_SIZE];
> +     };

Seems ugly to have to have a union just for that.  Can't we do
something like BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(u64) < SLICE_MASK_SIZE) instead?

> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static struct slice_mask slice_range_to_mask(unsigned long 
> start,
>                                            unsigned long len)
>  {
>       unsigned long end = start + len - 1;
> -     struct slice_mask ret = { 0, 0 };
> +     struct slice_mask ret = { 0, {0} };

Wouldn't { 0 } suffice?  Similarly in several places below.

Paul.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to