On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:28 AM, Claudiu Manoil wrote:
> The sram_offset parameter represents a physical address
> and should be of type phys_addr_t. As part of this fix,
> the extraction of sram_params is being cleaned-up and
> fixed.
> This patch fixes now the case when the offset value of
> 0xfff00000 was being rejected by the driver (returning
> -EINVAL), although this is a valid offset value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <yuantian.t...@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.man...@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h | 4 +-
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c | 39 ++++++++++------------------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
> b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
> index 60c9c0b..a4ce9b8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /*
> - * Copyright 2009-2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
> + * Copyright 2009-2010 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
we normally do 2009-2010, 2012
> *
> * QorIQ based Cache Controller Memory Mapped Registers
> *
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ struct mpc85xx_l2ctlr {
>
> struct sram_parameters {
> unsigned int sram_size;
> - uint64_t sram_offset;
> + phys_addr_t sram_offset;
> };
>
>
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
