On Jul 10, 2012, at 7:25 AM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Xu Jiucheng <jiucheng...@freescale.com> > wrote: >> Create the dts files for each core and splits the devices between >> the two cores for P1021RDB-PC. >> >> Core0 has l2, serial0, i2c, spi, gpio, tdm,dma, usb, eth0, eth1, >> sdhc, crypto, global-util, message, pci0, pci1, msi, crypto. >> Core1 has l2, serial1, eth2. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xu Jiucheng <jiucheng...@freescale.com> >> Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <m...@freescale.com> >> --- > > Do we really want AMP device trees upstream? They're very > application-specific, and AMP support has always been a hack. If > anything, I think we should be deleting AMP device trees from > upstream, not adding more.
Since we already have P1021RDB-PC w/AMP support in upstream I agree we don't need another example on P1021RDB-PC. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
