On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 16:43 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > There is some chance this will result in breakage because the driver > asks for N - and assumes that is what was allocated - and the device is > configured for > N.
We can fix that. We can whack the configuration back with N, just know that we have "allocated" > N. > But that's a hypothetical, and we know the current approach sucks > because it will result in many drivers falling back to a single > interrupt. > > I think this is the least-worst approach in light of the FW limitations, > and we can always add quirks in here if we really have to. > > Paul is the pseries maintainer so he gets to ACK or NAK it, but from an > MSI point of view it gets my +1. > Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
