The patch fixes two problems:

1. Working with task->mm w/o getting mm or grabing the task lock is
   dangerous as ->mm might disappear (exit_mm() assigns NULL under
   task_lock(), so tasklist lock is not enough).

   We can't use get_task_mm()/mmput() pair as mmput() might sleep,
   so we have to take the task lock while handle its mm.

2. Checking for process->mm is not enough because process' main
   thread may exit or detach its mm via use_mm(), but other threads
   may still have a valid mm.

   To catch this we use find_lock_task_mm(), which walks up all
   threads and returns an appropriate task (with task lock held).

Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.voront...@linaro.org>
---
 arch/blackfin/kernel/trace.c |   26 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/blackfin/kernel/trace.c b/arch/blackfin/kernel/trace.c
index 44bbf2f..d08f0e3 100644
--- a/arch/blackfin/kernel/trace.c
+++ b/arch/blackfin/kernel/trace.c
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
 #include <linux/thread_info.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/oom.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
@@ -28,7 +30,6 @@ void decode_address(char *buf, unsigned long address)
        struct task_struct *p;
        struct mm_struct *mm;
        unsigned long flags, offset;
-       unsigned char in_atomic = (bfin_read_IPEND() & 0x10) || in_atomic();
        struct rb_node *n;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KALLSYMS
@@ -114,15 +115,15 @@ void decode_address(char *buf, unsigned long address)
         */
        write_lock_irqsave(&tasklist_lock, flags);
        for_each_process(p) {
-               mm = (in_atomic ? p->mm : get_task_mm(p));
-               if (!mm)
-                       continue;
+               struct task_struct *t;
 
-               if (!down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem)) {
-                       if (!in_atomic)
-                               mmput(mm);
+               t = find_lock_task_mm(p);
+               if (!t)
                        continue;
-               }
+
+               mm = t->mm;
+               if (!down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem))
+                       goto __continue;
 
                for (n = rb_first(&mm->mm_rb); n; n = rb_next(n)) {
                        struct vm_area_struct *vma;
@@ -131,7 +132,7 @@ void decode_address(char *buf, unsigned long address)
 
                        if (address >= vma->vm_start && address < vma->vm_end) {
                                char _tmpbuf[256];
-                               char *name = p->comm;
+                               char *name = t->comm;
                                struct file *file = vma->vm_file;
 
                                if (file) {
@@ -164,8 +165,7 @@ void decode_address(char *buf, unsigned long address)
                                                name, vma->vm_start, 
vma->vm_end);
 
                                up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
-                               if (!in_atomic)
-                                       mmput(mm);
+                               task_unlock(t);
 
                                if (buf[0] == '\0')
                                        sprintf(buf, "[ %s ] dynamic memory", 
name);
@@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ void decode_address(char *buf, unsigned long address)
                }
 
                up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
-               if (!in_atomic)
-                       mmput(mm);
+__continue:
+               task_unlock(t);
        }
 
        /*
-- 
1.7.9.2

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to