On Aug 30, 2011, at 10:01 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> On Aug 30, 2011, at 9:51 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: >> >>> Kumar Gala wrote: >>>> Do we really want the generic "fsl,fpga-cpld"& "fsl,fpga-pixis"? This >>>> seems to vague. >>> >>> Yes, the PIXIS is generally register compatible across all boards. There >>> may be some minor differences, but the OCM driver can work with all PIXIS >>> boards that have an PIXIS. >> >> Is this true? Don't we have pixis and ngpixis in u-boot? > > I forgot about that. Well, everything I said is true about the ngpixis, > so I guess I should use "ngpixis" instead of just "pixis" here. I'll have > to check if the old pixis can be used this way. > >> >>>> Also you need "pixis" on MPC8544DS, MPC8572DS, MPC8536DS. >>> >>> Ok. >>> >>>> Also fpga-cpld makes no sense if we keep this. You are either a CPLD or >>>> FPGA not both. >>> >>> Then I don't understand what the CPLD is. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_programmable_logic_device > > Ok, I get it now. Is there a name for the CPLD we use on these chips? > I'm having a hard time getting proper documentation on the CPLD. York > expressed similar frustration. > > Perhaps these should be called board-control devices. How about > > fsl,boardcontrol-cpld > fsl,boardcontrol-ngpixis > fsl,boardcontrol-qixis
For the CPLD based boards I think: <BOARDNAME>-cpld is best as there isn't really much consistent right now. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
