On 08/16/2011 04:27 AM, Chunhe Lan wrote: > Nand flash nodes with the property status="disabled" are not > usable and so avoid adding "disabled" nand flash devices with > the system. > > Signed-off-by: Chunhe Lan <chunhe....@freescale.com> > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c | 5 ++++- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c > b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c > index 33d8aad..8212c12 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > /* Freescale Enhanced Local Bus Controller NAND driver > * > - * Copyright © 2006-2007, 2010 Freescale Semiconductor > + * Copyright © 2006-2007, 2010-2011 Freescale Semiconductor > * > * Authors: Nick Spence <nick.spe...@freescale.com>, > * Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> > @@ -849,6 +849,9 @@ static int __devinit fsl_elbc_nand_probe(struct > platform_device *pdev) > struct device *dev; > struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node; > > + if (!of_device_is_available(node)) > + return -ENODEV; > + > if (!fsl_lbc_ctrl_dev || !fsl_lbc_ctrl_dev->regs) > return -ENODEV; > lbc = fsl_lbc_ctrl_dev->regs;
Same comment as the other patch -- unavailable devices should already not be getting probed. Also, this subject line makes it sound like this is a NAND subsystem change rather than a change in one specific driver. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
