On 08/03/2011 05:04 AM, David Gibson wrote:
I still don't understand the distinction you're making. We're saying
the group is "owned" by a given user or guest in the sense that no-one
else may use anything in the group (including host drivers). At that
point none, some or all of the devices in the group may actually be
used by the guest.
You seem to be making a distinction between "owned by" and "assigned
to" and "used by" and I really don't see what it is.
Alex (and I) think that we should work with device/function granularity,
as is common with other archs, and that the group thing is just a
constraint on which functions may be assigned where, while you think
that we should work at group granularity, with 1-function groups for
archs which don't have constraints.
Is this an accurate way of putting it?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
