On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 20:08 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > The PC parallel port Kconfig as acquired one of those messy terms to > describe it's architecture dependencies: > > depends on (!SPARC64 || PCI) && !SPARC32 && !M32R && !FRV && \ > (!M68K || ISA) && !MN10300 && !AVR32 && !BLACKFIN > > This isn't just ugly - it also almost certainly describes the dependencies > too coarse grainedly. This is an attempt at cleaing the mess up. > > I tried to faithfully aproximate the old behaviour but the existing > behaviour seems inacurate if not wrong for some architectures or platforms. > To improve on this I rely on comments from other arch and platforms > maintainers. Any system that can take PCI multi-IO card or has a PC-style > parallel port on the mainboard should probably should now do a > select HAVE_PC_PARPORT. And some arch Kconfig files should further > restrict the use of HAVE_PC_PARPORT to only those platforms that actually > need it. > > Thanks, > > Ralf
> diff --git a/arch/unicore32/Kconfig b/arch/unicore32/Kconfig > index e57dcce..3832e7e 100644 > --- a/arch/unicore32/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/unicore32/Kconfig > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ config UNICORE32 > select HAVE_KERNEL_BZIP2 > select HAVE_KERNEL_LZO > select HAVE_KERNEL_LZMA > + select HAVE_PC_PARPORT > select GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT > select GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE > select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW In UniCore32, only some debug-boards need to support parport. So I'd like to add HAVE_PC_PARPORT and related configs to certian *_defconfig, but not in Kconfig. Thanks Ralf. Guan Xuetao _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
