On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 22:23 -0500, pac...@kosh.dhis.org wrote: > The diff fragment above applied inside prom_close_stdin, but there are > some > prom_printf calls after prom_close_stdin. Calling prom_printf after > closing > stdout sounds like it could be bad. If I moved it down below all the > prom_printf's, it would be after the "quiesce" call. Would that be > acceptable > (or even interesting as an experiment)? Does a close need a quiesce > after it?
Just try :-) "quiesce" is something that afaik only apple ever implemented anyways. It uses hooks inside their OF to shut down all drivers that do bus master (among other HW sanitization tasks). Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
