On Oct 12, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:55:42 -0500 > Kumar Gala <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Scott Wood wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:50:52 -0500 >>> Kumar Gala <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> The new e5500 core is similar to the e500mc core but adds 64-bit >>>> support. We support running it in 32-bit mode as it is identical to the >>>> e500mc. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> * Updated to remove CONFIG_PPC_E5500 and use E500MC >>> >>> It still has E500 || E500MC all over the place... >>> >>> If E500MC is not going to imply E500 that should be consistent for both >>> 32 and 64 bit -- though I think it would make more sense that E500MC >>> does imply E500. >>> >>> -Scott >> >> I have a problem with Kconfig and getting E500MC option to only exist in the >> proper cases. > > Does having P5020DS (and any future 64-bit-capable board) > explicitly select E500 as well as PPC_E500MC avoid the issue?
it does, kinda ugly but oh well. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
