On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:55:42 -0500 Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:50:52 -0500 > > Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > > >> The new e5500 core is similar to the e500mc core but adds 64-bit > >> support. We support running it in 32-bit mode as it is identical to the > >> e500mc. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> > >> --- > >> * Updated to remove CONFIG_PPC_E5500 and use E500MC > > > > It still has E500 || E500MC all over the place... > > > > If E500MC is not going to imply E500 that should be consistent for both > > 32 and 64 bit -- though I think it would make more sense that E500MC > > does imply E500. > > > > -Scott > > I have a problem with Kconfig and getting E500MC option to only exist in the > proper cases. Does having P5020DS (and any future 64-bit-capable board) explicitly select E500 as well as PPC_E500MC avoid the issue? -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
