On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:05 AM, Ian Munsie wrote: > >> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype >> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype >> index d361f81..074ff12 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype >> @@ -329,3 +329,19 @@ config CHECK_CACHE_COHERENCY >> bool >> >> endmenu >> + >> +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_LITTLE_ENDIAN >> + bool >> + >> +config CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN >> + bool "Build little endian kernel" >> + depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_LITTLE_ENDIAN && EXPERIMENTAL >> + default n >> + help >> + This option selects whether a big endian or little endian kernel will >> + be built. >> + >> + Note that if building a little endian kernel, CROSS_COMPILE must >> + point to a toolchain capable of targetting little endian powerpc, >> + while the toolchain specified by CROSS32_COMPILE must be capable of >> + targetting *BIG* endian PowerPC. >> -- >> 1.7.1 > > Shouldn't we have something that limits to the sub-arch'es that actually > support it? I doubt I'm ever going to make FSL-Book-e support LE.
Yes, it should. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
