On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:34:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 July 2010, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > I suggest to go back to v2 of your patch where you use asm-generic/of.h.
> >
> > Stephen suggested dropping asm-generic/of.h. I'm happy to do it either way.
>
> I don't mind adding stuff to asm-generic, but I think in this case it would
> be easier to keep this in linux/of.h because there is nothing wrong with
> all architectures including it.
>
> Most files in asm-generic are there only for historical reasons, where some
> architectures use them but others don't. IMHO we should use the include/linux
> headers preferred for new stuff though.
Hi Arnd.
Thanks for this explanation. Obviously my previous post
about asm-generic was wrong (as Grant already indicated).
Sam
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
