On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:48 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> > Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:42:20 -0600 > >> It protects against some later include file doing a #define >> of_node_to_nid and thus resulting in an inconsistent definition. If >> some code tries to do this then the preprocessor will complain. This >> is the pattern that Stephen suggested. > > Also, it would be nice to unravel the "0" vs. "-1" default > inconsistency.
Indeed. I looked at it briefly, but it wasn't immediately clear what the impact would be to switch powerpc over to -1, and it looked to me like sparc depends on -1 to signify no node association. g. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
