Yes. Where would we get a list of memreserve sections?
I would say the list of reserves that are not under the control of
Linux should be explicitly described in the device tree proper. For
instance, if you have a region that firmware depends on, then have a
node for describing the firmware and a property stating the memory
regions that it depends on. The memreserve regions can be generated
from that.
Ok, so we could traverse the tree node-by-bode for a
persistent-memreserve property and add them to the /memreserve/
list in
the kexec user space tools?
I *think* that is okay, but I'd like to hear from Segher, Ben, Mitch,
David Gibson, and other device tree experts on whether or not that
exact property naming is a good one.
Let's take a step back: what exactly _are_ "memreserve sections", what
are they used for, who (kernel, firmware, bootloader, etc.) holds what
responsibility wrt them?
Segher
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
