Actually, this is something which might need closer attention -
and maybe some support in the device tree indicating which read or
write width a device can accept?
There already is "device-width"; the drivers never should use any
other access width unless they *know* that will work.
Wouldn't you want to use "bank-width" instead?
We were talking about single devices. But, sure, when you have
multiple devices in parallel the driver needs to know about that.
It would be nice to have a device tree property that can specify that
all access widths supported by the CPU will work, though.
Oh please no. A device binding should not depend on what CPU there
is in the system. There could be multiple CPUs of different
architectures, even.
To figure out how to access a device, the driver looks at the device's
node, and all its parent nodes (or asks generic code to do that, or
platform code).
Segher
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
