On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 21:30:33 +0200 Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > Actually, this is something which might need closer attention - > > and maybe some support in the device tree indicating which read or > > write width a device can accept? > > There already is "device-width"; the drivers never should use any > other access width unless they *know* that will work. Wouldn't you want to use "bank-width" instead? "device-width" might not even work if, say, you've got two 8-bit chips interleaved, feeding into a bus controller in 16-bit mode that only accepts 16-bit accesses. It would be nice to have a device tree property that can specify that all access widths supported by the CPU will work, though. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
