> -----Original Message----- > From: Micha Nelissen [mailto:mi...@neli.hopto.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:55 PM > To: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] e500v2 36 bit large physical HID0[EN_MAS7_UPDATE] > > Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 wrote: > >> Attached is a patch to fix large physical address support for the > > > > This is already being done by u-boot, should linux set it again? > > Yikes! Took me 5 min to reformat your email. > > Our version of U-boot does not but it's not latest greatest. > > IMHO: > 1) Linux should not be dependent on U-boot or any other bootloader, or at > least as possible > 2) U-boot cannot (and does not want to) know whether Linux is going to > use large physical addresses. > Not sure of other platforms but on 85xx platforms on which I am currently working u-boot does LAW and eLBC programming for 36bit physical address. Hence possibly u-boot has to made aware of large physical address space. Please correct me if I am wrong. > Regards, > > Micha
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
