On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Albrecht Dreß <albrecht.dr...@arcor.de> wrote: > Hi Grant: > > Am 27.04.10 20:28 schrieb(en) Albrecht Dreß: >>> >>> MPC5121e Hardware Design Guide provides correct info according to my >>> tests using /16 and /10 prescaler. I've send a new patch with the fixed >>> comments, unfortunately forgot to mark it as v4, but it is threaded to your >>> v.3a patch and contains a small changelog, so I hope it is not a problem. >> >> Grant?  Is this fine for you, or should I "officially" re-send it? > > *ping* > > IMHO, this issue can be closed now, as the correct uart operation has been > verified on both the 512x (Anatolij) and 5200 (me) processors.  Do you > accept Anatolij's "joint patch" he sent on Apr 26, or is that procedure too > confusing?  And do we need further Acked-by's?
Yes, I'll pick up Anatolij's patch. No further work needed by you. g. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
