From: Julia Lawall <ju...@diku.dk>

Use set_cpus_allowed_ptr rather than set_cpus_allowed.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression E1,E2;
@@

- set_cpus_allowed(E1, cpumask_of_cpu(E2))
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(E1, cpumask_of(E2))

@@
expression E;
identifier I;
@@

- set_cpus_allowed(E, I)
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(E, &I)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <ju...@diku.dk>

---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -u -p a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -561,12 +561,12 @@ void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int m
         * se we pin us down to CPU 0 for a short while
         */
        old_mask = current->cpus_allowed;
-       set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(boot_cpuid));
+       set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(boot_cpuid));
        
        if (smp_ops && smp_ops->setup_cpu)
                smp_ops->setup_cpu(boot_cpuid);
 
-       set_cpus_allowed(current, old_mask);
+       set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &old_mask);
 
        snapshot_timebases();
 

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to