On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 18:15 +0000, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> writes: > > > On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 17:42 +0000, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> > >> > >> Ian Xen in this sense is simply not x86. irq_cfg is not acpi or > >> ioapic or anything but x86 specific. It has everything to do with > >> having a per cpu vector table of 256 entries and architecturally > >> receiving a vector number when an interrupt is fired. > >> > >> It totally makes sense for Xen to do something different because > >> architecturally it has a completely different irq subsystem. > > > > OK, so that sounds like you would like the same patchset but without the > > irq_cfg renaming? or potentially with renaming to x86_blah instead (I'll > > rework to your preference). > > Currently the renaming really makes it unclear what you are doing and for > some reason the description of the renaming rubbed me the wrong way.
Sorry, I started off a bit confused and then totally misunderstood what related to what and I think that came through in the description. I'll respin without the first patch. Ian. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
