Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> writes: > On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 17:42 +0000, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> >> Ian Xen in this sense is simply not x86. irq_cfg is not acpi or >> ioapic or anything but x86 specific. It has everything to do with >> having a per cpu vector table of 256 entries and architecturally >> receiving a vector number when an interrupt is fired. >> >> It totally makes sense for Xen to do something different because >> architecturally it has a completely different irq subsystem. > > OK, so that sounds like you would like the same patchset but without the > irq_cfg renaming? or potentially with renaming to x86_blah instead (I'll > rework to your preference).
Currently the renaming really makes it unclear what you are doing and for some reason the description of the renaming rubbed me the wrong way. Eric _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
