> diff --git a/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
> b/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
> index 909b78d..a391219 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
> @@ -587,6 +587,33 @@ void fs_cleanup_bds(struct net_device *dev)
>
>
> /**********************************************************************************/
>
> +static struct sk_buff *tx_skb_align_workaround(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *new_skb;
> +
> + /* Alloc new skb */
> + new_skb = dev_alloc_skb(ENET_RX_FRSIZE + 32);
> + if (!new_skb) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING DRV_MODULE_NAME
> + ": %s Memory squeeze, dropping tx packet.\n",
> + dev->name);I understand this type of printk fits to the rest of the code, I just wonder if new (and patched) printouts shouldn't be converted to dev_*? Might be one line then, and more consistent to what other drivers produce. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
