On Fri 11 Dec 2009 00:27:36 Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 20:23 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Dec 10, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > > #define PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_INSN_BP_RANGE 0x1 > > > #define PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_INSN_BP_MASK 0x2 > > > #define PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_RANGE 0x4 > > > #define PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_MASK 0x8 > > > > Is GDB smart enough to deal w/no condition_regs? On some Book-E > > devices we have 2 IACs, 2 DACs, and 0 DVCs. Does it need to be in the > > features? > > I had discussed it with the gdb team. I could easily add a feature > flag, but it would be equivalent to num_condition_regs > 0. I don't > have a strong opinion either way.
The current GDB code we have here uses num_condition_regs > 0 to discover if DVCs are supported, so a PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE constant for that is redundant IMHO. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
