On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:46:28 +0400
Anton Vorontsov <avoront...@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
> CAT25 chips (as manufactured by On Semiconductor, previously Catalyst
> Semiconductor) are similar to the original M25Px0 chips, except:
>
> - Address width can vary (1-2 bytes, in contrast to 3 bytes in M25P
> chips). So, implement convenient m25p_addr2cmd() and m25p_cmdsz()
> calls, and place address width information into flash_info struct;
>
> - Page size can vary, therefore we shouldn't hardcode it, so get rid
> of FLASH_PAGESIZE definition, and place the page size information
> into flash_info struct;
>
> - CAT25 EEPROMs don't need to be erased, so add NO_ERASE flag, and
> propagate it to the mtd subsystem.
This patch (still) doesn't know about the mx25l3205d, mx25l12805d and
mx25l12855e devices.
I randomly did this:
-> { "mx25l3205d", INFO(0xc22016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 256, 3, 0) },
-> { "mx25l6405d", INFO(0xc22017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 256, 3, 0) },
{ "mx25l12805d", INFO(0xc22018, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, 256, 3, 0) },
-> { "mx25l12855e", INFO(0xc22618, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, 256, 3, 0) },
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
