In message: <955e48b80908281105q60c057e8pfc16213f17da9...@mail.gmail.com>
Stuart Yoder <stuyo...@gmail.com> writes:
: > Lets *not* do it on power.org. I'd like to see the bindings used by
: > more than just powerpc people, and power.org might become a bit of a
: > mental barrier for non-powerpc folks. kernel.org would be a good
: > host. So would ozlabs or infradead. Or I'd be happy to maintain one
: > on secretlab.
:
: I think broadening it beyond power.org is good. Along those lines I'd prefer
: not having this on kernel.org, as device trees are not Linux-centric. There
: are other OS vendors I've interacted with that I'd like to see use device
trees
: and separating it from Linux may be better IMO.
I know of at least one other free OS that will be migrating to device
trees for enumeration of devices in the embedded space...
Warner
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
