On 2009-08-28, at 18:06, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Stuart Yoder<stuyo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Benjamin
Herrenschmidt<b...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 16:36 -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
The idea of a wiki as a registration authority is a good one, but
I'm
not volunteering to maintain it :-)
here goes my hope :-)
Do we have wiki's we could use on power.org or should we aim for a
community place ? Anybody has suggestions ? I wouldn't even try to
maintain a web site myself, that would be irresponsible of anybody
to
let me do so !
There was an ePAPR wiki on power.org, that I had started developing,
but it seems to have disappeared. I'm looking into what happened.
Lets *not* do it on power.org. I'd like to see the bindings used by
more than just powerpc people, and power.org might become a bit of a
mental barrier for non-powerpc folks. kernel.org would be a good
host. So would ozlabs or infradead. Or I'd be happy to maintain one
on secretlab.
What about openfirmware.info? I don't know anything about Core
Systems who maintains that site though.
Grant,
When choosing the best location for the bindings page please consider
it uniform enough so that various OSes can use it as a reference. We
are very much interested in bringing FDT support for embedded FreeBSD
(arm, powerpc), and one of the uncertainties is how to deal with
existing Linux bindings definitions: at the moment they are maintained
as part of kernel source tree, and there are doubts whether we should
come up with our own set (most likely *very* similar), which we'd like
to avoid.
Rafal
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
