On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 07:02:51PM +0800, Hu Mingkai-B21284 wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:24:17PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > >
> > > On Aug 18, 2009, at 6:38 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > >
> > > >This patch simply adds sdhci node to the device tree.
> > > >
> > > >We specify clock-frequency manually, so that eSDHC will
> > work without
> > > >upgrading U-Boot. Though, that'll only work for default setup (1500
> > > >MHz) on new board revisions. For non-default setups, it's
> > recommended
> > > >to upgrade U-Boot, since it will fixup clock-frequency
> > automatically.
> > > >
> > > >Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avoront...@ru.mvista.com>
> > >
> > > out of interest the 85xx eSDHC don't need the sdhci,wp-inverted
> > > property?
> >
> > Yes, eSDHC controllers in MPC85xx report normal state in its
> > registers.
> >
>
> Hi Anton,
>
> The eSDHC controller in different silicon version on MPC8536 reports
> different WP state in the register PRSSTAT:
Thanks a million for the heads up!
Yes, the manual I used ("MPC8536ERM Rev. 0 10/2008") doesn't mention
that, but the newer manual that I just downloaded ("MPC8536ERM Rev. 1
05/2009") does.
[...]
> For silicon 1.0, the macro SDHCI_QUIRK_INVERTED_WRITE_PROTECT is also
> defined,
> so the dirver will report the error WP state in function sdhci_get_ro.
Not any longer. We don't actually define it for any 85xx CPUs.
I need to think how should we handle all these WP inversions. :-)
So, we have inversion in BCSR (depending on the BCSR revision),
configurable inversion in CPU via GENCFGR for 1.1 silicon, and
non-configurable non-inverted reporting for 1.0 silicon...
Do you know if there are any plans to fix the WP inversion for
MPC8569E-MDS boards, or make something like GENCFGR for MPC8569
CPUs?
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmai...@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
