On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 10:10 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 25 May 2009, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > > > Right, that makes sense. However, most drivers use the field to store the > > > physical address, not the iomap token. Maybe there should be a new field > > > in struct sja1000_priv for the virtual address, but that would be a change > > > to the base driver, not just to the OF portion. > > > > Is that common practice? If yes, I will add a member to store the > > virtual address to struct sja1000_priv. > > I grepped through the network driver for usage of ->base_addr, and > it's somewhat inconsistent. The majority of the users use it for > a physical address, but there are also a few that use it for the > __iomem token.
In addition, iirc, it's not big enough to hold >32 bit physical addresses on 32-bit platforms no ? Ben. > Casts between unsigned long and qualified (__iomem, __user, const, ...) > pointers do not cause a warning, but can easily lead to bugs when > another user casts to an unqualified pointer. > > Arnd <>< > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev